|
colophon |
||
|
ebr submission guidelines
electronic book review Although our threads include review-essays on a wide range of topics, the editors at ebr are particularly interested in critically-savvy, in-depth work that addresses the electronic future of fiction, poetry, criticism, theory, and the visual and performing arts. ebr accepts work in plain-text format and free-standing hyperlinked pieces by arrangement. Please direct inquiries to the editors: editors@electronicbookreview.com
review process ^ In continuous publication since 1994, ebr is among the longest running critical reviews on the Internet. Each essay is reviewed by a thread editor (a tenured professor) and at least one other ebr editor. Using resources specific to our medium, ebr offers a forum in which critical discussion is staged: on acceptance, the essay is posted to our staging site, where it is made available for comment by our 500-plus past contributors, all of whom are published authors in print and online. Publication in ebr, therefore, is peer-to-peer, and public: a less secretive form of peer review that offers no settled critical standpoint or 'safe zones' for authors, reviewers, or editors. ebr reviewer comments can be read in the margins of the essays, as 'glosses.' More substantial response is given in commissioned Ripostes, and essay authors are welcome to respond to these in turn.
copy editing guidelines ^
illustration submission guidelines ^
|
|||